| Sinna (2pee4you) |
03-09-2015 03:54 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgardner
(Post 685425)
I'd thank you twice if I could. One because I've never heard of thisvid.com, and second because of how good this is. I guess she could've filled three glasses, but only had two. That would be 1.5l (no debate about it this time, those are pint glasses which means 568ml if filled right to the top).
|
I disagree. It did not feel like 500ml per glass right away. The glasses look too small in her hands and the stream is not powerful and thick enough to fill it up in 6seconds.
So I did some research. These are most likely the 0.25L versions of the glass. It could be the 0.33L, but these are not the 568ml glasses.
How do I know? First, the indications given above and my personal experience tell me that she is never peeing as much as you think. Secondly, the pint glass (568ml) is bigger and thus carlsberg had room to put the year "1847" below the "carlsberg" at the bottom of the glass.
The pint glasses have that year on them:
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...hL._SY300_.jpg
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Carlsberg-...item20f6bfa263
The 0.3l does not:
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/CARLSBERG-...item4ae47c7ab0
0.25l neither:
http://beerbeer.org/wp-content/uploa...1-472x1024.jpg
The glasses in the clip don't have "1847" on them (pause at 1:20). Which makes me believe they are indeed not the pint version, but 0.3 or even 0.25l |
